connecting users of the CorelDRAW family of products

Make one program of Corel Designer and Draw

rated by 0 users
This post has 8 Replies | 4 Followers

Page 1 of 1 (9 items) | RSS

Susanne Sjoliden Posted: 02-22-2008 1:31

Wouldn´t it be a good idea to make one program of Designer and Draw?

There are many functions in Draw that should be very good to have in Designer too and I believe that the Draw user could benefit from using some of the special functions in Designer; like Enhanced Line Types and Drawing Planes. 

To me it seems that the development of the Draw program is much higher than with Designer. There has been two new versions of Draw since version 12 of Designer. You also get much more things when you buy Draw such as cliparts and fonts. There are also a lot of tutorials, books and things like that for Draw but not for Designer.

I´m looking forward to hear comments about this :Smile

Top 150 Contributor
Casteren The Netherlands
Male

 Dear Susanne,

I agree. As Designer and Draw in principal use the same graphics kernel, it should not be a great effort to get the X4 kernel in TD 12 too: TD X4.

Although X4 is great, many of the extras of TD 12 are such that I continue to use TD 12 for line drawing work (ships plans).

More then a year ago I already submitted a list of TD 12 features for X (then 3) and X features for TD (X3 to come). The list can be found buried somewhere in the Technical Designer 12 thread in cnews,corel.com - c.Designer.

It boils down somewhat to give X4 (X5) the dockers of TD and TD X4 the property bar of X4.

Kind regards, JoostJ 

JoostJ

That's funny i just made a very similar post to this one. Why are they two programs? I think CorelDRAW would benefit by the few tools that exist in DESIGNER that aren't in DRAW especially the B-LINE, Enhanced Outlines and Planes as you've mentioned. Its so close might as well combine them and have designer layout as a workspace instead of two "different"  programs.

Top 10 Contributor
Stockholm, SWEDEN (Europe) Illustrator & Artist
Male

 Hi

 To begin with Corel bought the company that initially made Corel Designer, in contrast to CorelDRAW which was invented and originally made by the company Corel. Here is a link to a post and answer by Gérard M. at Corel. http://coreldraw.com/forums/p/650/2266.aspx#2266

Here is a quote from wikipedia.

    "  In 1985, Dr. Michael Cowpland founded Corel to sell Intel-based desktop publishing systems.
    In 1987, Corel hired software engineers Michel Bouillon and Pat Beirne to develop a vector-based illustration program to bundle with these desktop             publishing systems. That program, CorelDRAW, was initially released in 1989. The program was well received, and Corel soon focused on software             alone. CorelDRAW came into its own with Microsoft's release of Windows 3.1. The inclusion of TrueType in Windows 3.1 transformed CorelDRAW into a     serious illustration program capable to use system-installed outline fonts (it included its own proprietary outline font system) without requiring third party     software such as Adobe Type Manager. "

Here are some fun historic information on both Corel as a company, founded by Michael Cowplan, and the other link is about CorelDRAW.

Corel history >>
CorelDRAW history >>
Michael Cowplan bio on Wikipedia that is >>


CorelDesigner / Micrografx /  history
Corel Designer >>

 

Have fun reading

Stefan

 

Stefan Lindblad Artist & illustrator Website: www.stefanlindblad.com Blog: stefanlindblad-english.blogpsot.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dont forget pen & paper, they are the key to great digital art.

Hi Stefan,

I already know that Corel bought Micrografx since I been working with Designer a long time.

The meaning with this question was to get a discussion since I think that both programs have many good things and in order to compete with Adobe Illustrator it would be better if all the good things in both these programs could be put together..

Another thing is that since the release of Corel Designer 12 there has been 3 releases of Draw which to me looks like they focus more on that program.

I work with the textile industry and I can see that there are a couple of functions in Draw that I want to use in Designer or vice versa.

Have a nice day

Susanne

 

Top 10 Contributor
Stockholm, SWEDEN (Europe) Illustrator & Artist
Male

 Hi Susanne,

I have no problems with making CorelDRAW for example even better than it is today. In my own opinion, for my diverse needs, CorelDRAW outplay Illustrator any day in the week. I like and prefer CorelDRAW. Someone else will might say differently.

When it comes to competing with Adobe Illustrator, I think that its not up to only quality of programs, as it is to advertising the products. So even if I personally think CorelDRAW is better than Adobe Illustrator, I think that without better advertising Corels products, it doesnt matter if Corel merge CorelDRAW and Designer. But I wouldnt be suprised if Designer and CorelDRAW will merge someday. But probably with the name CorelDRAW designer Graphic Suite? Just because CorelDRAW seem to be a stronger name in the business than Designer. Said without any surveys confirming it Smile

Stefan Lindblad Artist & illustrator Website: www.stefanlindblad.com Blog: stefanlindblad-english.blogpsot.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dont forget pen & paper, they are the key to great digital art.

Hey Stefan,

You're right corel's marketing is weak. Their website needs to be slick and free and its corporate and boring. (though its a little better lately) I had to go around town today and i visited Staples(Business Depot), Future Shop and Best Buy and not one place has a single copy of X4 (Strange). Probably because the demand isn't there.

I also agree with you that corel is does 80% of things better than adobe's software but i never understood why they don't comb through the competition and really out do them 110% (beat them and go beyond). I know that vector capital's strategy changed and they no longer want to compete directly with adobe (at least this is what i read) but i think if this is true its a big mistake and it will cost them even more maket share and for sure market share growth.

PP need to get back into the ring. CD is already mostly better than Ai but PP needs some LOVE.

Dear Corel please give PP the love it deserves. 

Not Ranked
Victoria, BC, Canada
Male

Although this has little to do with the original thread, I couldn't resist agreeing with the all of above comments.

Maybe Corel just doesn't have the money to really compete with Adobe. Maybe Corel has spread itself too thin with too many products in too many different categories. I'm not sure how important CorelDRAW is to Corel. If it is important, I wish they would decide to issue a really sigificant next version of both DRAW and PP, and then really promote them. Maybe offer lite and full versions with Designer, Knockout etc incorporated.

I suggest a survey be developed for this site to solicit ideas for product image improvement, promotion, etc. 

George

Top 150 Contributor
Stuttgart (Germany)
Male
CorelEmployee

Hello Susanne,

You might be interested in having a closer look at what happens to Corel DESIGNER. The beta registration is currently open on corel.com. For more information please check out my blog entry.

Susanne Sjoliden:
Another thing is that since the release of Corel Designer 12 there has been 3 releases of Draw which to me looks like they focus more on that program.

Corel DESIGNER Technical Suite 12 is technically based on / using the CorelDRAW engine 12.5 . Some of the features initially developed for Corel DESIGNER 12 were introduced to CorelDRAW X3 afterwards (e.g. enhancements to dynamic guides).

Best regards,
Klaus.

Page 1 of 1 (9 items) | RSS
© 2008 Corel Corporation. The content herein is in the form of a personal web log ("Blog") or forum posting. As such, the views expressed in this site are those of the participants and do not necessarily reflect the views of Corel Corporation, or its affiliates and their respective officers, directors, employees and agents. Terms and Conditions.